While I would love to say yes (given I started to move the build to JDK11), i have a concern about this move coming soon. I'd love to have a JakartaEE 9 compatible client but that requires JDK8, so 2.17 might be a little too soon. I have some preliminary work on this and plan to be working on it to have something ready as soon as possible. Cheers, Emmanuel
Le 15/01/2021 à 10:41, Domenico Francesco Bruscino a écrit : > +1 > > Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 21:03 Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > >> Finally! >> >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Francesco Nigro <nigro....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 !! >>> >>> Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 20:33 Christopher Shannon < >>> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >>> >>>> +1 from me, JDK 11 has been around a couple years now so I think it's >>> fine. >>>> It would be nice to be able to use some of the new language features in >>> the >>>> broker. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:28 PM Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> On 1/12/21 11:35 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>>>>> I would like to propose requiring JDK 11 as a minimal requirement >> on >>>>>> ActiveMQ Artemis on master, to be released as 2.17 >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> JDK 8 is about end of life, and that would open up better >>>>>> possibilities on what we write in Artemis. JDK 8 is pretty old at >>> this >>>>>> point and we need to move on. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone would object? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Tim Bish >>>>> >>>>>
