Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s why better to ask to infra). Regards JB
> Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Aren't the Apache GitHub repos just mirrors of the official versions on > Apache's infrastructure? I know when we merge PRs we push to > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If the GitHub repo is just a mirror wouldn't we > have to rename the branch on Apache first? I'm not real clear on all the > details of how the integration works so maybe that's wrong. > > > Justin > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> GitHub solved the PR move if the rename is done via their UI: >> >> https://github.com/github/renaming <https://github.com/github/renaming> >> >> -Matt >> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Good point. >>> >>> I’m not sure what to do with pending PRs >>> >>> In artemis you could use the scripts and they would work. >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 no problem. Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those. >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic < >> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I would like to propose to rename all of our git branches as main on >>>>> all of our branches. This would be a very first easy step to take on >>>>> renaming offensive language from our codebases. >>>>> >>>>> We could allow some time before we do that, say 7 days after we decide >>>>> to take the move. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees a problem with that? >>>>> >>>>> if anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if you have a >>>>> downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to update your >>>>> internal git repos and scripts. >>>>> >>>>> We could keep the master for some time without being updated, until we >>>>> remove it later. >>>> >>>> -- >>> Clebert Suconic >> >>
