That’s my guess as well ;)
> Le 9 mars 2021 à 08:57, michael.andre.pearce
> <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> I assume the plan is to cover all repos, not just artemis.Sent from my Galaxy
> -------- Original message --------From: Clebert Suconic
> <[email protected]> Date: 06/03/2021 14:33 (GMT+00:00) To:
> [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming master as main We
> will have to create the main branch on gitbox and Infra will make theswitch
> on GitHub.On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> <[email protected]>wrote:> Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s why
> better to ask to infra).>> Regards> JB>> > Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, Justin
> Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit :> >> > Aren't the Apache GitHub repos
> just mirrors of the official versions on> > Apache's infrastructure? I know
> when we merge PRs we push to> > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If the GitHub
> repo is just a mirror> wouldn't we> > have to rename the branch on Apache
> first? I'm not real clear on all the> > details of how the integration works
> so maybe that's wrong.> >> >> > Justin> >> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM
> Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> >> GitHub solved the PR move
> if the rename is done via their UI:> >>> >>
> https://github.com/github/renaming <https://github.com/github/renaming>> >>>
> >> -Matt> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic
> <[email protected]> >> >> wrote:> >>>> >>> Good point.> >>>> >>> I’m
> not sure what to do with pending PRs> >>>> >>> In artemis you could use the
> scripts and they would work.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM Matt
> Pavlovich <[email protected]>> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1 no problem. Please
> to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those.> >>>> Thanks!> >>>>> >>>>> On
> Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <> >> [email protected]>>
> >>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>> I would like to propose to rename all of our git
> branches as main on> >>>>> all of our branches. This would be a very first
> easy step to take on> >>>>> renaming offensive language from our codebases.>
> >>>>>> >>>>> We could allow some time before we do that, say 7 days after we>
> decide> >>>>> to take the move.> >>>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees a problem with
> that?> >>>>>> >>>>> if anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if
> you have a> >>>>> downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to
> update your> >>>>> internal git repos and scripts.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could
> keep the master for some time without being updated, until> we> >>>>> remove
> it later.> >>>>> >>>> --> >>> Clebert Suconic> >>> >>>> --Clebert Suconic
