I see the website is the pelican system.

I'm not sure how the AMQ5 is configured on Jenkins... that's the only thing
I'm lost now.



On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:31 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That's right.. I will do it for all the Branches...
>
>
> At this point now I'm looking to what I would need to change on ci-builds
>
>
> I'm looking on ci-builds for things we would need to change..
>
> however I don't understand how ActiveMQ5 is configured here:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/
>
>
> I could find the simple configuration on artemis, but AMQ5 is using
> some fancy configuration that I don't know where it's taking it from.
>
> @Jb or anyone can you give me some pointers here? I'm really curious
> now.. (I know you could say you would change it. .but at this point
> I'm trying to understand what is going on :) )
>
>
> Also: where is the build for the website? I can't find it on
> ci-builds.apache.org
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > That’s my guess as well ;)
> >
> > > Le 9 mars 2021 à 08:57, michael.andre.pearce <
> [email protected]> a écrit :
> > >
> > > I assume the plan is to cover all repos, not just artemis.Sent from my
> Galaxy
> > > -------- Original message --------From: Clebert Suconic <
> [email protected]> Date: 06/03/2021  14:33  (GMT+00:00) To:
> [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming master as main We
> will have to create the main branch on gitbox and Infra will make theswitch
> on GitHub.On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> [email protected]>wrote:> Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s why
> better to ask to infra).>> Regards> JB>> > Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, Justin
> Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit :> >> > Aren't the Apache GitHub
> repos just mirrors of the official versions on> > Apache's infrastructure?
> I know when we merge PRs we push to> > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If the
> GitHub repo is just a mirror> wouldn't we> > have to rename the branch on
> Apache first? I'm not real clear on all the> > details of how the
> integration works so maybe that's wrong.> >> >> > Justin> >> > On Fri, Mar
> 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> >>
> GitHub solved the PR move if the rename is done via their UI:> >>> >>
> https://github.com/github/renaming <https://github.com/github/renaming>>
> >>> >> -Matt> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> [email protected]> >> >> wrote:> >>>> >>> Good point.> >>>> >>>
> I’m not sure what to do with pending PRs> >>>> >>> In artemis you could use
> the scripts and they would work.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM
> Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1 no problem.
> Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those.> >>>> Thanks!> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <> >>
> [email protected]>> >>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>> I would like to
> propose to rename all of our git branches as main on> >>>>> all of our
> branches. This would be a very first easy step to take on> >>>>> renaming
> offensive language from our codebases.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could allow some
> time before we do that, say 7 days after we> decide> >>>>> to take the
> move.> >>>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees a problem with that?> >>>>>> >>>>> if
> anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if you have a> >>>>>
> downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to update your> >>>>>
> internal git repos and scripts.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could keep the master for
> some time without being updated, until> we> >>>>> remove it later.> >>>>>
> >>>> --> >>> Clebert Suconic> >>> >>>> --Clebert Suconic
> >
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Reply via email to