That's right.. I will do it for all the Branches...
At this point now I'm looking to what I would need to change on ci-builds I'm looking on ci-builds for things we would need to change.. however I don't understand how ActiveMQ5 is configured here: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/ I could find the simple configuration on artemis, but AMQ5 is using some fancy configuration that I don't know where it's taking it from. @Jb or anyone can you give me some pointers here? I'm really curious now.. (I know you could say you would change it. .but at this point I'm trying to understand what is going on :) ) Also: where is the build for the website? I can't find it on ci-builds.apache.org On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> wrote: > > That’s my guess as well ;) > > > Le 9 mars 2021 à 08:57, michael.andre.pearce > > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > I assume the plan is to cover all repos, not just artemis.Sent from my > > Galaxy > > -------- Original message --------From: Clebert Suconic > > <[email protected]> Date: 06/03/2021 14:33 (GMT+00:00) To: > > [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming master as main We > > will have to create the main branch on gitbox and Infra will make theswitch > > on GitHub.On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre > > <[email protected]>wrote:> Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s why > > better to ask to infra).>> Regards> JB>> > Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, Justin > > Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit :> >> > Aren't the Apache GitHub > > repos just mirrors of the official versions on> > Apache's infrastructure? > > I know when we merge PRs we push to> > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If the > > GitHub repo is just a mirror> wouldn't we> > have to rename the branch on > > Apache first? I'm not real clear on all the> > details of how the > > integration works so maybe that's wrong.> >> >> > Justin> >> > On Fri, Mar > > 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> >> > > GitHub solved the PR move if the rename is done via their UI:> >>> >> > > https://github.com/github/renaming <https://github.com/github/renaming>> > > >>> >> -Matt> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic > > <[email protected]> >> >> wrote:> >>>> >>> Good point.> >>>> >>> > > I’m not sure what to do with pending PRs> >>>> >>> In artemis you could use > > the scripts and they would work.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:54 PM > > Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1 no problem. > > Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those.> >>>> Thanks!> >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <> >> > > [email protected]>> >>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>> I would like to > > propose to rename all of our git branches as main on> >>>>> all of our > > branches. This would be a very first easy step to take on> >>>>> renaming > > offensive language from our codebases.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could allow some > > time before we do that, say 7 days after we> decide> >>>>> to take the > > move.> >>>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees a problem with that?> >>>>>> >>>>> if > > anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if you have a> >>>>> > > downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to update your> >>>>> > > internal git repos and scripts.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could keep the master for > > some time without being updated, until> we> >>>>> remove it later.> >>>>> > > >>>> --> >>> Clebert Suconic> >>> >>>> --Clebert Suconic > -- Clebert Suconic
