Looks like we are good/tested - we will need two more PMC members votes to verify the provenance and release it this evening.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:44 PM Kacper Muda <mudakac...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Also verified by running some example DAGs on different environments. > > On 2024/07/03 08:59:57 Maciej Obuchowski wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Verified by running some example DAGs. > > > > wt., 2 lip 2024 o 18:16 Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> napisał(a): > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. > > > > > > This email is calling a vote on the release, > > > which will last for 24 hours - which means that it will end on Wed, > 3rd of > > > July at 18:30 CEST. > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > This is an accelerated vote as this is just openlineage rc2 after rc1 > was > > > withdrawn from previous vote after a bug was found. > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > provider > > > packages. > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > is > > > described in: > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > are > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/40555 > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the > RC > > > candidates. > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > documentation > > > after the > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > You can find the openlineage RC packages in PyPI following this link: > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.9.0rc2/ > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > J. > > > > >
