-1

Checked reproducibility, checksums, licences. Those look good!

There seems to be a problem with the signatures, however? I did reimport
from KEYS. Jarek, do you maybe have a local key you were experimenting with
for the trusted publishing workflow or something?


Checking apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0-py3-none-any.whl.asc

gpg: assuming signed data in
'apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0-py3-none-any.whl'
gpg: Signature made Tue Jul  2 09:31:15 2024 MDT
gpg:                using RSA key A9A8E81A53009F34B1200BB5E3F1C6A4B0DE8968
gpg:                issuer "dev@airflow.apache.org"
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Checking apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0.tar.gz.asc

gpg: assuming signed data in
'apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Tue Jul  2 09:31:15 2024 MDT
gpg:                using RSA key A9A8E81A53009F34B1200BB5E3F1C6A4B0DE8968
gpg:                issuer "dev@airflow.apache.org"
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

Reply via email to