-1 Checked reproducibility, checksums, licences. Those look good!
There seems to be a problem with the signatures, however? I did reimport from KEYS. Jarek, do you maybe have a local key you were experimenting with for the trusted publishing workflow or something? Checking apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0-py3-none-any.whl.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0-py3-none-any.whl' gpg: Signature made Tue Jul 2 09:31:15 2024 MDT gpg: using RSA key A9A8E81A53009F34B1200BB5E3F1C6A4B0DE8968 gpg: issuer "dev@airflow.apache.org" gpg: Can't check signature: No public key Checking apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Tue Jul 2 09:31:15 2024 MDT gpg: using RSA key A9A8E81A53009F34B1200BB5E3F1C6A4B0DE8968 gpg: issuer "dev@airflow.apache.org" gpg: Can't check signature: No public key