AAAAH. Thanks Jed. My bad. I have done it on a new machine and my key was not setup properly apparently.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:46 PM Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org> wrote: > -1 > > Checked reproducibility, checksums, licences. Those look good! > > There seems to be a problem with the signatures, however? I did reimport > from KEYS. Jarek, do you maybe have a local key you were experimenting with > for the trusted publishing workflow or something? > > > Checking apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0-py3-none-any.whl.asc > > gpg: assuming signed data in > 'apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0-py3-none-any.whl' > gpg: Signature made Tue Jul 2 09:31:15 2024 MDT > gpg: using RSA key A9A8E81A53009F34B1200BB5E3F1C6A4B0DE8968 > gpg: issuer "dev@airflow.apache.org" > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key > Checking apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0.tar.gz.asc > > gpg: assuming signed data in > 'apache_airflow_providers_openlineage-1.9.0.tar.gz' > gpg: Signature made Tue Jul 2 09:31:15 2024 MDT > gpg: using RSA key A9A8E81A53009F34B1200BB5E3F1C6A4B0DE8968 > gpg: issuer "dev@airflow.apache.org" > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key >
