+1 binding.
also would propose the provider thing first to be able to faster
iterate. If then HITL looping needs dependencies to core... anyway can
be changed in future.
Great initiative, will open a lot more use cases!
On 1/14/26 20:46, Oliveira, Niko wrote:
+1 binding
Looks great!
________________________________
From: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 10:05:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Vikram Koka
Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-99 Common Data Access Pattern + AI
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne
cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas
confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le
contenu ne présente aucun risque.
I strongly believe that we should focus on this as a provider for right
now, iterate really quickly, and validate this, before we attempt to put
this into Core Airflow.
100%
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 6:33 PM Vikram Koka via dev <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hey Pavan,
Great work on this AIP.
I really like the level of detail on this and especially love the sample
code!
I have a nuanced +1 binding on this.
I am absolutely +1 binding on Phase 1 of the approach i.e. doing this as a
Standalone Provider.
I strongly believe that we should focus on this as a provider for right
now, iterate really quickly, and validate this, before we attempt to put
this into Core Airflow.
Best regards,
Vikram
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 9:04 AM Ankit Chaurasia <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
*Ankit Chaurasia*
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:38 PM Josh Fell via dev <
[email protected]
wrote:
Ooo nice!
+1 binding
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:00 AM constance.astronomer.io via dev <
[email protected]> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Jan 14, 2026, at 9:03 AM, Vincent Beck <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1 binding
On 2026/01/14 09:41:01 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
+1 (binding). Exciting times
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026, 10:35 Pavankumar Gopidesu <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Kaxil and I would like to calling a vote on this AIP
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=406618285
The previous discussion thread was
https://lists.apache.org/thread/dgpgvoszh52vxxszmg65wmcgxnj9zwby
Based on the discussion, we have parked cyclicness behaviour to
the
new
AIP.
Thank you everyone who commented on the AIP and responded on the
discussion
thread.
The vote will run for 5 days and last till next tuesday, the 20th
of
Jan
2026 23:30 GMT.
Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and
Committers'
votes are considered binding.
Please vote accordingly
[ ] +1 Approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Since Kaxil and I are co-authoring this, please consider this is
our
+2
binding :)
Regards,
Kaxil and Pavan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
