+1 binding

great proposal !

Regards,
Sriraj Dheeraj Turaga

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:48 AM Amogh Desai <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 binding. Good work on the amount of detail and the market research
> performed
> to identify the gaps Airflow has when it comes to AI workloads and helping
> prepare
> for the AI era to come.
>
> I would also be in favour of making the provider changes first. Not sure if
> this has been
> discussed already, but `airflow.providers.ai` sounds a bit odd to me,
> maybe
> something
> like `common.ai` or `common.llm` would make more sense to me.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 7:55 AM Rahul Vats <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding. Great work!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rahul Vats
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 3:11 PM, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding). Exciting times
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026, 10:35 Pavankumar Gopidesu <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Kaxil and I would like to calling a vote on this AIP
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=406618285
> > > >
> > > > The previous discussion thread was
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dgpgvoszh52vxxszmg65wmcgxnj9zwby
> > > >
> > > > Based on the discussion, we have parked cyclicness behaviour to the
> new
> > > > AIP.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you everyone who commented on the AIP and responded on the
> > > discussion
> > > > thread.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will run for 5 days and last till next tuesday, the 20th of
> > Jan
> > > > 2026 23:30 GMT.
> > > >
> > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and
> > Committers'
> > > > votes are considered binding.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Since Kaxil and I are co-authoring this, please consider this is our
> +2
> > > > binding :)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kaxil and Pavan
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to