+1 binding. Good work on the amount of detail and the market research performed to identify the gaps Airflow has when it comes to AI workloads and helping prepare for the AI era to come.
I would also be in favour of making the provider changes first. Not sure if this has been discussed already, but `airflow.providers.ai` sounds a bit odd to me, maybe something like `common.ai` or `common.llm` would make more sense to me. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 7:55 AM Rahul Vats <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 binding. Great work! > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 3:11 PM, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding). Exciting times > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026, 10:35 Pavankumar Gopidesu <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > Kaxil and I would like to calling a vote on this AIP > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=406618285 > > > > > > The previous discussion thread was > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dgpgvoszh52vxxszmg65wmcgxnj9zwby > > > > > > Based on the discussion, we have parked cyclicness behaviour to the new > > > AIP. > > > > > > Thank you everyone who commented on the AIP and responded on the > > discussion > > > thread. > > > > > > The vote will run for 5 days and last till next tuesday, the 20th of > Jan > > > 2026 23:30 GMT. > > > > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and > Committers' > > > votes are considered binding. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly > > > > > > [ ] +1 Approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Since Kaxil and I are co-authoring this, please consider this is our +2 > > > binding :) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Kaxil and Pavan > > > > > >
