Hello everyone, Following Shahar's idea - and a number of PRs he has already opened this way - I would like to call for lazy consensus on making it a rule for agent-drafted PR descriptions:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/73660 The idea is simple: * A PR description drafted by an AI agent starts with a short "Human Summary" - a few sentences typed by the human author, in their own words: why the change is needed, key decisions, caveats. * The agent-written description is still there, but below it, in an "AI Summary" section that is folded by default. * Agents are instructed to ask the user for the Human Summary and paste it verbatim - they must never write, suggest or paraphrase it themselves. This should make it much easier (not with 100% certainty, but quite reliably) to tell PRs where a human understood and owns the change apart from fully AI-generated ones. It also gives reviewers a quick, human-level "why" before they dive into the details. The PR only changes the guidance our agents follow (AGENTS.md and the PR drafting/publishing skills) plus one bullet in the Gen-AI section of contributing-docs. The regular PR template is unchanged - PRs created by humans without agents are not affected. The PR itself is "dog-fed" - it uses the new format. As this is straightforward and uncontroversial, I plan to merge the PR before the lazy consensus ends. If there are objections, we can simply revert it. The lazy consensus will end on Monday, 28 September 2026, 15:00 CEST, unless there are objections. J. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
