Sorr. I merged it because I **thought** it was non-controversial (I have not seen any complaints about it before) - and yeah - I wrote that if there will be any complaints I will revert it.
I am going to do now, and start a discussion as apparently it is apparently controversial. I do not agree with your arguments - I think it's exact opposite of what you imply - and it's "centaur and not reverse centaur [1] (or meat proxy)" - where human is in control. BTW. I highly recommend the book "Reverse - author of the "Entshittification" term. The book "The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI" is a fantastic book, I literally swallowed it and it opened my eyes to many things. [1] https://doctorow.medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2025-09-11-vulgar-thatcherism-there-is-an-alternative-f1428b42a8fd J On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 3:33 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > No. > > -1 as it stands. > > The PR description should already be for humans only. The PR description > is the way the person opening the PR engages with the community, and being > a meat proxy shows they don’t care about the consumers of it. Your proposal > is reversing the priority to my mind > > I.e. I think we should remove the `Human Summary ` and `AI Summary` > headers, and use `<details><summary>AI Summary</summary>` instead of “click > here”. > > Additionally: why did you merge this PR just 30mins after sending this > email when the date below says “in 4 days”? > > -ash > > > > On 24 Sep 2026, at 13:27, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Following Shahar's idea - and a number of PRs he has already opened this > > way - I would like to call for lazy consensus on making it a rule for > > agent-drafted PR descriptions: > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/73660 > > > > The idea is simple: > > > > * A PR description drafted by an AI agent starts with a short "Human > > Summary" - a few sentences typed by the human author, in their own > > words: why the change is needed, key decisions, caveats. > > * The agent-written description is still there, but below it, in an > > "AI Summary" section that is folded by default. > > * Agents are instructed to ask the user for the Human Summary and paste > > it verbatim - they must never write, suggest or paraphrase it > > themselves. > > > > This should make it much easier (not with 100% certainty, but quite > > reliably) to tell PRs where a human understood and owns the change > > apart from fully AI-generated ones. It also gives reviewers a quick, > > human-level "why" before they dive into the details. > > > > The PR only changes the guidance our agents follow (AGENTS.md and the > > PR drafting/publishing skills) plus one bullet in the Gen-AI section of > > contributing-docs. The regular PR template is unchanged - PRs created by > > humans without agents are not affected. The PR itself is "dog-fed" - it > > uses the new format. > > > > As this is straightforward and uncontroversial, I plan to merge the PR > > before the lazy consensus ends. If there are objections, we can simply > > revert it. > > > > The lazy consensus will end on Monday, 28 September 2026, 15:00 CEST, > > unless there are objections. > > > > J. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
