Hi, What do you guys think of this email subject? IMHO it would make an additional requirement for the unix builds of httpd, but windows is dependent on it anyhow.
OTOH, the xlate would go to it's proper place, because it is a part of apr-iconv. The reason is simple. If someone needs xlate stuff, then he will use apr-iconv. The apr-util will in that case become really apr only dependant, which is not the case right now. Since apr-iconv is dependent on apr and apr-util, while (now) apr-util is dependent on apr-iconv (only on windows) this makes sense thought. Regards, Mladen.
