On 5/8/06, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
What do you guys think of this email subject?
IMHO it would make an additional requirement
for the unix builds of httpd, but windows is
dependent on it anyhow.
OTOH, the xlate would go to it's proper place,
because it is a part of apr-iconv.
The reason is simple. If someone needs xlate
stuff, then he will use apr-iconv. The apr-util
will in that case become really apr only dependant,
which is not the case right now.
Since apr-iconv is dependent on apr and apr-util,
while (now) apr-util is dependent on apr-iconv
(only on windows) this makes sense thought.
I think that's a horrible idea. There are many operating systems
where you don't need apr-iconv in order to get apr_xlate to work, I
see zero benefit to making them download and build apr-iconv in order
to use the apr_xlate APIs.
-garrett
