William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
OTOH, the xlate would go to it's proper place,
because it is a part of apr-iconv.
Nope, you got it entirely upside down.
apr_xlate is a simple (not quite simple enough) interface for encoding
translations. If it's via iconv, or libiconv, or any other codepage
transformation library is irrelevant.
I disagree.
The entire point is that it's the translation library.
So, what is the purpose of apr-iconv anyhow?
I suppose to give a translation to platforms not having
the iconv, right? And that is Windows. So why not name
the apr-iconv win-icov?
Regards,
Mladen.
