On 4/14/2011 11:57 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 4/14/2011 10:32 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> Speak up if you're working on something for apr-util. >>> >>> I had originally planned to T&R this at the same time as apr 1.4.3, >>> but I may as well get started. If folks want to wait for apr 1.4.3 to >>> test apr-util, that's fine too. >>> >>> I still anticipate that apr will be ready for T&R of 1.4.3 within a >>> couple of days ;) >> >> Do you mean, shipping apr_crypto? Ugh... > > no :) > > apr-util 1.3.11; not apr-util 1.4.0 (and still, apr 1.4.3 soon-ish) > > I don't see the typo, but I'll assume there are some numbers left open > to interpretation...
I didn't read the entire subject line ;-P FWIW, the one bit of that last apr_crypto.h illustration that I can't get my head around is the apu_error handling. Wondering if there is any real purpose to returning apr_error's at all, if an apu_error would generally be nested in that?
