On 4/14/2011 7:19 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > Please explicitly state which elements of your laundry list were not > addressed in > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=899910, so they may be > fixed.
I will do that... I was not blocking 2.0... I was commenting on my mistaken impression that Jeff planned to tag 1.4. I'm sorry that I was confused and sorry if my comments slighted all your efforts on trunk. Guessing you are catching up on list traffic sequentially and you'll note that Jeff clarified this wasn't about apr-util 1.4 at all. Presuming we want some apr-util 1.4/1.5, I'll get the review done shortly against *trunk* anticipating that we will replace apr_crypto before any official apr project release, if that works for you?
