On 5/15/2011 3:33 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 15 Apr 2011, at 3:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> Guessing you are catching up on list traffic sequentially and you'll note >> that >> Jeff clarified this wasn't about apr-util 1.4 at all. Presuming we want some >> apr-util 1.4/1.5, I'll get the review done shortly against *trunk* >> anticipating >> that we will replace apr_crypto before any official apr project release, if >> that >> works for you? > > All the changes in your laundry list that hadn't already been done on trunk > have now been > applied to trunk, most specifically the reordering of the parameters and the > removal of > apr_crypto_t where apr_crypto_block_t was already present in the API call. > Apart from > whitespace and comments, your previously posted apr_crypto.h and apr v2.0's > apr_crypto.h > are now identical.
Coolio!!! Looking at this now. > Next step will be to backport the current apr v2.0 API to v1.4, so that there > is just one > common API in v2.0 and v1.4, which will in theory remove any blockers we > currently have > over releasing apr-util v1.4. > > Does this plan make sense? Yes, that sounds like the plan, we just have to go back to the recent vote thread to determine if this is 1.4.0, or 1.4.1, or 1.5.0.
