On 4/15/2011 3:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > Are you referring to the order of the parameters? If so, then +1 to any > change that will > may the parameters more consistent (given that the current order is inspired > by by > apr_dbd). Let me look at that too, based on the header file you submitted.
Ok... don't be surprised if you find one or two inconsistencies... as I mentioned to Jeff, I had not finished a second pass through. I'll scribble something on apr naming conventions, argument order, variable and member names, and required/suggested structure field order just as soon as httpd 2.2/2.3beta have flown, but I'm happy to review trunk apr_crypto after apr is tagged, so we can align httpd modules to the 'final' api prototypes prior to beta.
