On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 11:30 -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> then all further patches to apr_fnmatch.c would still be licensed in
> BSD terms and consumable upstream, provided the PMC is agreeable;
> 5. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with
> on a case-by-case basis by the PMC.
> This would make the synchronization of POSIX [:class:] and other bug
> fixes and extensions to apr_fnmatch much simpler.
> Would this be acceptable to APR PMC?

As far as I'm concerned, that's fine provided we have no objections
from any significant contributors.  A quick look at svn suggests
that's basically yourself, with some early commits from Ryan.
I don't think Ryan is active here any more, so perhaps he should
be pinged as a matter of courtesy?

Or is his name there a mere technicality, perhaps a legacy
of an initial code drop into svn?

Nick Kew

Reply via email to