On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 11:30 -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > then all further patches to apr_fnmatch.c would still be licensed in > BSD terms and consumable upstream, provided the PMC is agreeable; > > 5. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with > on a case-by-case basis by the PMC. > > This would make the synchronization of POSIX [:class:] and other bug > fixes and extensions to apr_fnmatch much simpler. > > Would this be acceptable to APR PMC?
As far as I'm concerned, that's fine provided we have no objections from any significant contributors. A quick look at svn suggests that's basically yourself, with some early commits from Ryan. I don't think Ryan is active here any more, so perhaps he should be pinged as a matter of courtesy? Or is his name there a mere technicality, perhaps a legacy of an initial code drop into svn? -- Nick Kew
