I still monitor the list, I just don’t post.  If I remember correctly, this
code came from httpd 1.3.  I might have made some small changes, but I am
pretty sure this code’s lineage could be traced all the way back to when it
was BSD licensed.  I say go ahead for my part.


On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:36 AM Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 11:30 -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > then all further patches to apr_fnmatch.c would still be licensed in
> > BSD terms and consumable upstream, provided the PMC is agreeable;
> >
> > 5. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with
> > on a case-by-case basis by the PMC.
> >
> > This would make the synchronization of POSIX [:class:] and other bug
> > fixes and extensions to apr_fnmatch much simpler.
> >
> > Would this be acceptable to APR PMC?
> As far as I'm concerned, that's fine provided we have no objections
> from any significant contributors.  A quick look at svn suggests
> that's basically yourself, with some early commits from Ryan.
> I don't think Ryan is active here any more, so perhaps he should
> be pinged as a matter of courtesy?
> Or is his name there a mere technicality, perhaps a legacy
> of an initial code drop into svn?
> --
> Nick Kew
> --
Ryan Bloom

Reply via email to