Hi Linus,
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 22:47 +0200, Linus Tolke wrote: > I have contacted the Software Freedom Conservancy. I hope that most of > these problems can be solved that way, with as little inconvenience to > us as possible. How optimistic are you that they will accept ArgoUML? It would seem that if they do, it would solve a lot of problems for the ArgoUML community. On paper, they look like a godsend. However, I agree with Tom that no third party organization is going to relieve the ArgoUML community from the hard work of establishing a community charter. good luck, roy > > /Linus > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: den 21 juli 2006 18:40 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Formalizing the ArgoUML community > > > > Thanks for the pointer to the article. It's good background, but it > seems > > heavily focused on the money and the mechanics for a U.S.-based > non-profit. > > The are other very important, nay critical things, like coming to > common > > agreement on a charter that don't even get mentioned. > > > > > If the ArgoUML project owners consent, I would be happy to > > > make an inquiry on behalf of ArgoUML. > > > > I think it would be much more appropriate for one of the ArgoUML > project > > leaders to do that. There are a number of umbrella organizations that > > provide services like the Software Freedcom Conservancy. > > > > Tom > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
