Hello Roy!

 

I have only gotten polite answers from the Software Freedom Conservancy. They seem to work slowly.

 

The last notice I got was a reply to my question if we were still a candidate. >From the 23:rd of August:

 

Hi Linus,

 

You are still a candidate - the Project Evaluation Committee is making good progress giving all of the projects that have requested admission into the Conservancy a thorough review. I will keep you posted as to their progress and may contact you if they have any questions during their review process.

 

apologies for the delay,

Karen

 

 

      /Linus

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Roy Feldman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Sent: den 7 september 2006 13:29

> To: [email protected]

> Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Formalizing the ArgoUML community

>

> Hi Linus,

>

> I was just wondering if you have any news, good or bad, from

> the Software Freedom Conservancy.

>

> BTW, congratulations to all ArgoUML developers on release 0.22. Thank

> you very much.

>

> cheers,

>

> roy

>

>

> On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 22:28 +0200, Linus Tolke wrote:

> > Hello Roy!

> >

> >

> >

> > I am optimistic but I have currently not yet any ground for neither

> > optimism nor pessimism. I have so far only received the following

> > standard response:

> >

> >

> >

> > Many thanks for your email, which will be forwarded to the

> > Conservancy's project evaluation committee. The committee will take a

> > look at the link you provided and possibly follow up with additional

> > questions as it familiarized itself with the project and conducts the

> > due diligence process.

> >

> >

> >

> > I agree that the idea behind the Software Freedom Conservancy looks

> > like just what we are looking for to solve this.

> >

> >

> >

> > When it comes to the community charter, I am also an optimist (always

> > an optimist). I think that we have already most of the community in

> > place and the purposes documented on the web site. We are not starting

> > from scratch. Exactly what is it that we don’t have?

> >

> >

> >

> >       /Linus

> >

> >

> >

> > > -----Original Message-----

> >

> > > From: Roy Feldman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> >

> > > Sent: den 22 juli 2006 12:53

> >

> > > To: [email protected]

> >

> > > Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Formalizing the ArgoUML community

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Hi Linus,

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 22:47 +0200, Linus Tolke wrote:

> >

> > > > I have contacted the Software Freedom Conservancy. I hope that

> > most of

> >

> > > > these problems can be solved that way, with as little

> > inconvenience to

> >

> > > > us as possible.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > How optimistic are you that they will accept ArgoUML?  It  would

> > seem

> >

> > > that if they do, it would solve a lot of problems for the ArgoUML

> >

> > > community.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > On paper, they look like a godsend.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > However, I agree with Tom that no third party organization is going

> > to

> >

> > > relieve the ArgoUML community from the hard work of establishing a

> >

> > > community charter.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > good luck,

> >

> > >

> >

> > > roy

> >

> > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >   /Linus

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > > -----Original Message-----

> >

> > > > > From: Tom Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> >

> > > > > Sent: den 21 juli 2006 18:40

> >

> > > > > To: [email protected]

> >

> > > > > Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Formalizing the ArgoUML community

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > Thanks for the pointer to the article.  It's good background,

> > but it

> >

> > > > seems

> >

> > > > > heavily focused on the money and the mechanics for a U.S.-based

> >

> > > > non-profit.

> >

> > > > > The are other very important, nay critical things, like coming

> > to

> >

> > > > common

> >

> > > > > agreement on a charter that don't even get mentioned.

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > > If the ArgoUML project owners consent, I would be happy to

> >

> > > > > > make an inquiry on behalf of ArgoUML.

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > I think it would be much more appropriate for one of the ArgoUML

> >

> > > > project

> >

> > > > > leaders to do that.  There are a number of umbrella

> > organizations that

> >

> > > > > provide services like the Software Freedcom Conservancy.

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > Tom

 

Reply via email to