Hello!
This is a tough question. I would like to see some basic things like Undo in
place before we go to 1.0. If UML2 is completed first, then I am not sure
what to do. We also have the option of going directly from 0.35.whatever to
2.0 if we think it is a good idea to have the number 2 to associate it with
UML2.
On the other hand, if someone completes a significant change, like new icons
and splash screen or a significant amount of new languages (ruby, C#, ...)
then that could also be a reason for moving to 1.0. With our dayily small
and hard to notice steps in the development it is hard to see the big
things.
For 0.34 I know of the following "big" user things:
- Report generator (argoprint) added to the distribution.
- Access to the German version of the User Manual directly in the Help
menu.
Is that grand enough for the version 1.0 without Undo?
/Linus
2011/5/26 Mark Fortner <[email protected]>
> I agree with Michiel and Bob in terms of release 1.0 with UML 1.4 and
> version 2.0 with UML 2.0 capabilities. However, there are a number of fit
> and polish and usability issues that it would be good to deal with before a
> 1.0 release.
>
> - We definitely need more modern icons. The current Swing L&F icons
> make the software look pretty dated, and I don't think that's what we want
> to communicate in a 1.0 release.
>
> - There's also an issue around the representation of generics in
> collections like Maps, and in more complex "collections of collections".
> http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6211
>
> - The code generation templates can generate some strange artifacts in
> the code.
> - [C# code templates]
> http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5916
> - [Java code templates]
> http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6239
>
>
> - Users don't currently have a way of creating code using a customized
> template, this means that they can generate code that doesn't meet their
> own
> coding standards. This results in more work for the user, and kinda
> defeats
> the purpose of code generation.
>
> - It would be good to have some profiles with stereotypes to support
> web application development.
>
> - Support diagram-level comments (assuming the UML standards support
> this).
>
> Most of these are out of my own personal wishlist, and I don't think they
> are necessarily tasks that are particularly onerous to do and could probably
> be accomplished within a weekend. It might be worth everyone going through
> their own wishlist and identifying which tasks are relatively short, and
> provide the most user benefit.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Bob Tarling <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> If I were to choose an option I would lean towards Michiel rather than
>> Thomas
>>
>> If we are ignoring our own internal interface issues then we should
>> have branded ourselves as 1.0 long ago so why should we now wait.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> On 25 May 2011 15:17, Thomas Neustupny <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > it's clear that we have not yet an agreed decision about that. So here
>> is another (my) opinion on 1.0:
>> >
>> > I'd vote for a 1.0 release when we have:
>> > 1. stable UML2 support with all diagrams and OCL
>> > 2. Undo/Redo
>> >
>> > I don't think UML 1.4 is enough for a 1.0 release in 2011, we're years
>> too late for that.
>> >
>> > I also don't think that internal interfaces are to be considered for the
>> 1.0 release, because a "1.0" clearly should address users, not developers.
>> Also eclipse integration or integration of/into other frameworks (e.g. GEF
>> substitution) are not criteria in my eyes.
>> >
>> > For marketing reasons, one could also consider visual changes that will
>> come with 1.0, but this is not what I'd be interested in. Maybe a new
>> logo/splashscreen. I don't care too much here.
>> >
>> > Just my 2 cents.
>> >
>> > Thomas
>> >
>> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> >> Datum: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:38:44 +0200
>> >> Von: Michiel van der Wulp <[email protected]>
>> >> An: [email protected]
>> >> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] Release 1.0 (was - Release schedule)
>> >
>> >> On 25-05-11 13:31, Bob Tarling wrote:
>> >> > 3. ASAP
>> >> >
>> >> > As an application ArgoUML is stable and improving. So moving to
>> >> > release 1.0 promotes that stability to the users. The users don't
>> >> > really care that our internal interfaces are not particularly well
>> >> > defined.
>> >>
>> >> Hmmm, I would like to have ArgoUML 1.0 now as the stable release to
>> use
>> >> for UML 1 and then after a while ArgoUML 2.0 as the first stable
>> release
>> >> supporting UML2...
>> >> Yes, V1.0 ASAP.
>> >> Michiel
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2747842
>> >>
>> >> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
>> >> [[email protected]].
>> >> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
>> >> email: [[email protected]]
>> >
>> > --
>> > NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren!
>> > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2747874
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
>> [email protected]].
>> > To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
>> email: [[email protected]]
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2747934
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
>> [email protected]].
>> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
>> email: [[email protected]]
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2748982
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email:
[[email protected]]
