+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sasha Krassovsky <krassovskysa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> ++1 (non-binding) >> >> > 24 авг. 2022 г., в 08:53, Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> >> написал(а): >> > + 1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Benjamin Kietzman <bengil...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022, >> > 17:43: >> > >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, 11:32 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello, >> >>> I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to >> >>> C++17 as its baseline supported version (currently C++11). >> >>> The rationale and subsequent discussion can be read in the archives >> here: >> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9g14n3odhj6kzsgjxr6k6d3q73hg2njr >> >>> The exact steps and timeline for switching can be decided later on, but >> >>> this proposal implies that it could happen soon, possibly next week :-) >> >>> ... or, more realistically, in the next Arrow C++ release, 10.0.0. >> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >>> [ ] +1 Switch to C++17 in the impeding future >> >>> [ ] +0 >> >>> [ ] -1 Do not switch to C++17 because... >> >>> Regards >> >>> Antoine. >>
