+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 5:35 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, I assume this doesn't impact python wheels. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 2:15 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > In <7ab9b8ef-d5ca-313f-4b12-79647f32a...@python.org> > > "[VOTE] C++: switch to C++17" on Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:31:52 +0200, > > Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to > > > C++17 as its baseline supported version (currently C++11). > > > > > > The rationale and subsequent discussion can be read in the archives > > > here: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9g14n3odhj6kzsgjxr6k6d3q73hg2njr > > > > > > The exact steps and timeline for switching can be decided later on, > > > but this proposal implies that it could happen soon, possibly next > > > week :-) > > > ... or, more realistically, in the next Arrow C++ release, 10.0.0. > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 Switch to C++17 in the impeding future > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 Do not switch to C++17 because... > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Antoine. > > > -- Niranda Perera https://niranda.dev/ @n1r44 <https://twitter.com/N1R44>
