+1
On 2022-08-24 12:50, Weston Pace wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:24 AM Keith Kraus
<ke...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:12 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sasha Krassovsky <
krassovskysa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
++1 (non-binding)
24 авг. 2022 г., в 08:53, Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid
написал(а):
+ 1 (non-binding)
Benjamin Kietzman <bengil...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug.
2022,
17:43:
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, 11:32 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org>
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to
C++17 as its baseline supported version (currently C++11).
The rationale and subsequent discussion can be read in the archives
here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/9g14n3odhj6kzsgjxr6k6d3q73hg2njr
The exact steps and timeline for switching can be decided later on,
but
this proposal implies that it could happen soon, possibly next week
:-)
... or, more realistically, in the next Arrow C++ release, 10.0.0.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Switch to C++17 in the impeding future
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not switch to C++17 because...
Regards
Antoine.
