+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:24 AM Keith Kraus <ke...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:12 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sasha Krassovsky < > > krassovskysa...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> ++1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> > 24 авг. 2022 г., в 08:53, Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid > > > > > >> написал(а): > > >> > + 1 (non-binding) > > >> > > > >> > Benjamin Kietzman <bengil...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug. > > 2022, > > >> > 17:43: > > >> > > > >> >> +1 (binding) > > >> >> > > >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, 11:32 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> > > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Hello, > > >> >>> I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to > > >> >>> C++17 as its baseline supported version (currently C++11). > > >> >>> The rationale and subsequent discussion can be read in the archives > > >> here: > > >> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9g14n3odhj6kzsgjxr6k6d3q73hg2njr > > >> >>> The exact steps and timeline for switching can be decided later on, > > but > > >> >>> this proposal implies that it could happen soon, possibly next week > > :-) > > >> >>> ... or, more realistically, in the next Arrow C++ release, 10.0.0. > > >> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > >> >>> [ ] +1 Switch to C++17 in the impeding future > > >> >>> [ ] +0 > > >> >>> [ ] -1 Do not switch to C++17 because... > > >> >>> Regards > > >> >>> Antoine. > > >> > >
