> -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Berin Loritsch > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [proposal] transfer of fortress and ecm > > Stephen McConnell wrote: > > > > > Hi Leo: > > > > Before considering the subject of any transfer or endorsement there is > > one item that I consider to be a prerequisite responsibility that Avalon > > has toward it users. This item is the delivery of binary compatibility > > of ECM/Fortress component within the Merlin platform. Would the members > > your representing be willing to assist in getting this in place? > > With all due respect, there would be very little reason for us to do so. > How you help your users is what Avalon is about. All we are asking for > is the ability to continue with the Fortress/ECM based projects as they > are. They can be improved as necessary through natural processes.
Trying to make sure I understand: The Fortress Fork Group (FFG) does not oppose development of an ECM/Fortress adaptor for Merlin, or the development of migration tools for ECM/Fortress users to Merlin, but does not promise to offer assistance in such development. That is, such development would be left up to Avalon. Is that right? J. Aaron Farr SONY ELECTRONICS DDP-CIM (724) 696-7653 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
