Dude what's the patch to - Pico itself?  I'd like to fiddle with this if you
need testers.

Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farr, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:15 PM
> To: 'Avalon Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [proposal] transfer of fortress and ecm
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Bennett
> >
> > I also hope that some/all of the BOP will continue to be a part of the
> > *stackable* component-container specification ideas that Niclas is
> > spearheading, and that as these specifications are fleshed out, we can
> > see a bright new day of interoperability first among the Avalon
> > container siblings, and then branching out throughout the IoC community.
> >   If we (Avalon + BOP) can at least rally around Niclas' specification
> > ideas, it is possible for us to establish a model of cooperation that
> > might be contagious through the rest of the community.  I hope that not
> > only interest from Avalon and the BOP still exists in this domain (apart
> > from the pragmatic maintenance of an existing product), but that real
> > action will result from mere intellectual interest.
> 
> There are plenty of interested parties in seeing interoperability between
> IoC Frameworks.  For example, see:
> 
> http://www.jroller.com/comments/lsd?anchor=run_your_avalon_components_in
> 
> For Leo's announcement about Avalon components running in Pico.
> 
> J. Aaron Farr
>   SONY ELECTRONICS
>   DDP-CIM
>   (724) 696-7653
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to