> -----Original Message----- > From: Farr, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:24 PM > To: 'Avalon Developers List' > Subject: RE: [proposal] transfer of fortress and ecm > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alex Karasulu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:18 PM > > To: 'Avalon Developers List' > > Subject: RE: [proposal] transfer of fortress and ecm > > > > Dude what's the patch to - Pico itself? I'd like to fiddle with this if > > you > > need testers. > > > > Alex > > I believe it a new feature to Nanocontainer actually. LSD would have all > the details. Or check out the Pico mailing list. > > jaaron
Oh, and while I'm at it, my little JingDAO container [1] is a little PicoContainer wrapped up in Avalon lifecycle and configuration goodness. I've thought about taking some of the ideas for it and rolling them into a module for Nanocontainer. Anyway, point is, this container runs basic Avalon components and Pico Components as well. The hard part isn't supporting the basic Avalon framework; it's all the meta-info and configuration files. JingDAO doesn't have this support and I'm not sure if Leo's patch for Nano does either. J. Aaron Farr SONY ELECTRONICS DDP-CIM (724) 696-7653 [1] http://jingdao.sf.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
