Stephen McConnell wrote:
<snip>
In my opinion this is counterproductive because it sends the wrong message and reinforces the false notion that the framework is a product.
Framework WAS a product, and that is very important. What is currently in Avalon (should be Avalon 5) does not have framework as a separate product--and I am ok with that. However, denying that Framework was a product is denying what identified Avalon 4.
So, everyone, this can not be so difficult.
I am humbly suggesting that;
Whatever content existed under the /framework URL is kept without redirects, and let Aaron/Leo/whoever feel the urge to make it better.
I think its bad move. Instead Aaron/Leo/whoever could work within the existing structure and add a few "Since: X.Y" paragraphs. In addition supplementary info could be added about historical digressions.
The new structure breaks URL compatibility with the old which is really bad.
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
- Rich Cook
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
