Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia - SPO) wrote:
Please be fair, Steve.
I think I'm being fair because I'm grounding my arguments on technical substance.
Merlin so called semantics are being named as Avalon
semantics, that's the whole point and root of all this mess.
I would argue that the "mess" in this equation was the historical absence of specifications concerning important - no - critical semantics. This is not a Merlin thing - it's simply the fact that the missing semantics are now being documented.
There is no longer any reasonable justification for concurrent, conflicting, or non-existent specifications. If we don't like the resulting Avalon semantics - then we change the specification (within the historical constraints we are subject to).
Stephen.
--
|---------------------------------------| | Magic by Merlin | | Production by Avalon | | | | http://avalon.apache.org | |---------------------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
