many design documents are mixed in maillist, jira comments, it would be a
big help to put them in a centralized list. Also I would expect more
wiki/blogs to provide in-depth analysis, like the translation from pipeline
to runner specified topology, window/trigger implementation. Without these
knowledge, it's hard to touch the core concepts.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Got it. By experience on other Apache projects, it's really hard to
> maintain ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 04/24/2017 02:56 PM, Etienne Chauchot wrote:
>
>> Hi JB,
>>
>> I was proposing a FAQ (or another form), not something about IDE setup.
>> The FAQ
>> could group in the same place Q/A like for example "what is a source, how
>> do I
>> use it to implement an IO"
>>
>> Etienne
>>
>>
>> Le 24/04/2017 à 14:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Etienne,
>>>
>>> What about the contribution guide ? I think it's covered in the IntelliJ
>>> and
>>> Eclipse setup sections.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 04/24/2017 02:12 PM, Etienne Chauchot wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I definitely agree with everything that is said in this thread.
>>>>
>>>> I might suggest another good to have:
>>>>
>>>> to ease the work of a new contributor, it would be nice to have some
>>>> sort of
>>>> programming guide but not oriented to pipeline writers but to
>>>> sdk/runner/io/...
>>>> writers.
>>>>
>>>> I know that new contributors have the docs available in the google
>>>> drive, the
>>>> ML, the code base, and the availability of beamers, but maybe having
>>>> key points
>>>> in a common place (like FAQ for sdk/runner/io/... writers, for example)
>>>> would be
>>>> interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Etienne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 24/04/2017 à 09:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we already tag the newbie jira ("low hanging fruit" ;)).
>>>>>
>>>>> Good idea for domain of interest/concept.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/24/2017 09:01 AM, Ankur Chauhan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Might I suggest adding tags to projects based on area of intetest,
>>>>>> concept
>>>>>> and if it's a good "first bug".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2017, at 23:03, Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Have people unassign themselves from issues they're not actively
>>>>>>>> working on.
>>>>>>>> 2. Have the community engage more in triage, improving tickets
>>>>>>>> descriptions and raising concerns.
>>>>>>>> 3. Clean house - apply (2) to currently open issues (over 800).
>>>>>>>> Perhaps
>>>>>>>> some can be closed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 on all three of these, and will do my part shortly!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, it is worth noting that we have improved as a project in
>>>>>>> tracking
>>>>>>> issues in the last 1-2 months. There are more resolved issues than
>>>>>>> opened
>>>>>>> in this period, whereas in the past we'd have a hundred more opened
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> resolved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would also propose to not assign new Jira automatically: now, the
>>>>>>> Jira is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> automatically assigned to the Jira component leader.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Imagine a user discovering an issue and filing a new JIRA issue. It
>>>>>>> wouldn't be assigned to anyone, significantly reducing the chance
>>>>>>> somebody
>>>>>>> will actually help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course, somebody could search for new issues periodically, etc.
>>>>>>> -- but
>>>>>>> that just won't happen. The final outcome would be -- instead of a
>>>>>>> lot of
>>>>>>> issues assigned to component leads, we'd have (much) more unassigned
>>>>>>> issues, which were *never* looked at. Assigning an issue just sets a
>>>>>>> community expectation that a committer should look -- and it does
>>>>>>> help move
>>>>>>> things along!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think a better approach of addressing the current state would be
>>>>>>> increase
>>>>>>> the number of components / component leads. With more people
>>>>>>> involved and
>>>>>>> lower per-person load, I think we'd be more effective.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>



-- 
----
Mingmin

Reply via email to