It's just a step that needs to be peformed before the new release works on
Dataflow. Alan is saying that we've been unable to validate Dataflow so
far, as worker images are not yet built. Hopefully they'll be built soon,
and we'll be able to validate.

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Alan
>
> does it related to change in the codebase or in a dependency/related
> project ?
>
> I mean: is it something we have to fix/change in Beam ?
>
> Just curious as I'm not sure what you mean by "worker images" ;)
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 31/01/2018 22:18, Alan Myrvold wrote:
>
>> -1 (for now, hope to change this)
>>
>> Dataflow runner jobs are failing for me with 2.3.0 RC1, for both Java and
>> Python.
>>
>> This is not an issues with the 2.3.0 RC1 SDK, we (google) need to release
>> worker images.
>>
>> I have assigned these bugs to myself, and will be working to help get
>> these workers released.
>>
>> [BEAM-3584] Java dataflow job fails with 2.3.0 RC1, due to missing worker
>> image
>> [BEAM-3585] Python dataflow job fails with 2.3.0 RC1, due to missing
>> worker image
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks Kenn,
>>
>>     I prepared the list of tasks I did. I will complete where release is
>>     out.
>>
>>     Regards
>>     JB
>>
>>     On 01/31/2018 03:07 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>     > I've cloned the release validation spreadsheet:
>>     >
>>     >     https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>>     <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
>>     >
>>     > If you plan to perform a manual validation task, please sign up so
>> multiple
>>     > people don't waste effort.
>>     >
>>     > Alan & JB, as far as your pairing up to automate more, anything
>> manual on this
>>     > sheet should be considered.
>>     >
>>     > Kenn
>>     >
>>     > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >     +1 (binding)
>>     >
>>     >     Casting my own +1 ;)
>>     >
>>     >     Regards
>>     >     JB
>>     >
>>     >     On 01/30/2018 09:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>     >     > Hi everyone,
>>     >     >
>>     >     > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>> version 2.3.0, as
>>     >     > follows:
>>     >     >
>>     >     > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>     >     > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> comments)
>>     >     >
>>     >     >
>>     >     > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> includes:
>>     >     > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>     >     > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>      >     <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>>     >     > which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>>     >     > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> Repository [4],
>>     >     > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC1" [5],
>>     >     > * website pull request listing the release and publishing the
>> API reference
>>     >     > manual [6].
>>     >     > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK
>> 1.8.0_111.
>>     >     > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release
>> to the
>>      >     > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>     <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>>     >     >
>>     >     > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> majority
>>     >     approval,
>>     >     > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>     >     >
>>     >     > Thanks,
>>     >     > JB
>>     >     >
>>     >     > [1]
>>     >     >
>>     >     https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj
>> ectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj
>> ectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>>     >     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro
>> jectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj
>> ectId=12319527&version=12341608>>
>>     >     > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>>
>>     >     > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>>
>>     >     > [4] https://repository.apache.org/
>> content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach
>> ebeam-1026/>
>>     >     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapac
>> hebeam-1026/
>>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach
>> ebeam-1026/>>
>>     >     > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>
>>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>>
>>     >     > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>>     >     --
>>     >     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>      > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>      > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>      >     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>      >
>>      >
>>
>>     --
>>     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to