What is the common procedure in cases like this ? Because it doesn't
seems that it needs a re-vote, just an extra day or two for
validation, any ideas JB ?

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Alan Myrvold <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, it is a dataflow step. Happy to test this again when they are
> available.
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> OK, I think I understood ;)
>>
>> So it's not "directly" related to Beam itself (it's more a Dataflow step
>> to perform).
>>
>> @Alan, I think it's better to test first and then cast the vote. This kind
>> of tests are valuable to validate the release and make sense. But vote
>> should represent the state of the Beam release. So I think -1 vote is a bit
>> too early before the test.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 31/01/2018 22:33, Reuven Lax wrote:
>>>
>>> It's just a step that needs to be peformed before the new release works
>>> on Dataflow. Alan is saying that we've been unable to validate Dataflow so
>>> far, as worker images are not yet built. Hopefully they'll be built soon,
>>> and we'll be able to validate.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi Alan
>>>
>>>     does it related to change in the codebase or in a dependency/related
>>>     project ?
>>>
>>>     I mean: is it something we have to fix/change in Beam ?
>>>
>>>     Just curious as I'm not sure what you mean by "worker images" ;)
>>>
>>>     Thanks !
>>>     Regards
>>>     JB
>>>
>>>     On 31/01/2018 22:18, Alan Myrvold wrote:
>>>
>>>         -1 (for now, hope to change this)
>>>
>>>         Dataflow runner jobs are failing for me with 2.3.0 RC1, for both
>>>         Java and Python.
>>>
>>>         This is not an issues with the 2.3.0 RC1 SDK, we (google) need
>>>         to release worker images.
>>>
>>>         I have assigned these bugs to myself, and will be working to
>>>         help get these workers released.
>>>
>>>         [BEAM-3584] Java dataflow job fails with 2.3.0 RC1, due to
>>>         missing worker image
>>>         [BEAM-3585] Python dataflow job fails with 2.3.0 RC1, due to
>>>         missing worker image
>>>
>>>         On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>              Thanks Kenn,
>>>
>>>              I prepared the list of tasks I did. I will complete where
>>>         release is
>>>              out.
>>>
>>>              Regards
>>>              JB
>>>
>>>              On 01/31/2018 03:07 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>>>              > I've cloned the release validation spreadsheet:
>>>              >
>>>              > https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>>>         <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>
>>>              <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation
>>>         <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>>
>>>              >
>>>              > If you plan to perform a manual validation task, please
>>>         sign up so multiple
>>>              > people don't waste effort.
>>>              >
>>>              > Alan & JB, as far as your pairing up to automate more,
>>>         anything manual on this
>>>              > sheet should be considered.
>>>              >
>>>              > Kenn
>>>              >
>>>              > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>              > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>>>              >
>>>              >     +1 (binding)
>>>              >
>>>              >     Casting my own +1 ;)
>>>              >
>>>              >     Regards
>>>              >     JB
>>>              >
>>>              >     On 01/30/2018 09:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>              >     > Hi everyone,
>>>              >     >
>>>              >     > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1
>>>         for the version 2.3.0, as
>>>              >     > follows:
>>>              >     >
>>>              >     > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>              >     > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>>         specific comments)
>>>              >     >
>>>              >     >
>>>              >     > The complete staging area is available for your
>>>         review, which includes:
>>>              >     > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>              >     > * the official Apache source release to be deployed
>>>         to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>> <http://dist.apache.org>
>>>               >     <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>>>              >     > which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>         C8282E76 [3],
>>>              >     > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>         Repository [4],
>>>              >     > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC1" [5],
>>>              >     > * website pull request listing the release and
>>>         publishing the API reference
>>>              >     > manual [6].
>>>              >     > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and
>>>         Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111.
>>>              >     > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the
>>>         source release to the
>>>               >     > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>>         <http://dist.apache.org>
>>>              <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>>>              >     >
>>>              >     > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
>>>         adopted by majority
>>>              >     approval,
>>>              >     > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>              >     >
>>>              >     > Thanks,
>>>              >     > JB
>>>              >     >
>>>              >     > [1]
>>>              >     >
>>>              >
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>>
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>>>
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>>
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>>
>>>              >
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>>>
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>>>
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>>>
>>>              >     > [2]
>>>         https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>>>              <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>>
>>>              >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>>>              <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>>>
>>>              >     > [3]
>>>         https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>>              <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>>
>>>              >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>>>              <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>         <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>>>
>>>              >     > [4]
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>>>
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/>
>>>
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>>>
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/>>
>>>              >
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/>
>>>
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>>>
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/>>>
>>>              >     > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>
>>>              <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>>
>>>              >     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>
>>>              <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>>>
>>>              >     > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>>>              <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>>
>>>              >     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>>>              <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>>>         <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>>>
>>>              >     >
>>>              >
>>>              >     --
>>>              >     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>               > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>              <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>>>               > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>               >     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>               >
>>>               >
>>>
>>>              --
>>>              Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>         http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>              Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to