Hopefully we can validate soon. I believe some of the delays are because of integrating major changes done over the last week (e.g. Java 8 migration).
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > What is the common procedure in cases like this ? Because it doesn't > seems that it needs a re-vote, just an extra day or two for > validation, any ideas JB ? > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Alan Myrvold <amyrv...@google.com> > wrote: > > Yes, it is a dataflow step. Happy to test this again when they are > > available. > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > >> > >> OK, I think I understood ;) > >> > >> So it's not "directly" related to Beam itself (it's more a Dataflow step > >> to perform). > >> > >> @Alan, I think it's better to test first and then cast the vote. This > kind > >> of tests are valuable to validate the release and make sense. But vote > >> should represent the state of the Beam release. So I think -1 vote is a > bit > >> too early before the test. > >> > >> Thanks ! > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On 31/01/2018 22:33, Reuven Lax wrote: > >>> > >>> It's just a step that needs to be peformed before the new release works > >>> on Dataflow. Alan is saying that we've been unable to validate > Dataflow so > >>> far, as worker images are not yet built. Hopefully they'll be built > soon, > >>> and we'll be able to validate. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Alan > >>> > >>> does it related to change in the codebase or in a > dependency/related > >>> project ? > >>> > >>> I mean: is it something we have to fix/change in Beam ? > >>> > >>> Just curious as I'm not sure what you mean by "worker images" ;) > >>> > >>> Thanks ! > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On 31/01/2018 22:18, Alan Myrvold wrote: > >>> > >>> -1 (for now, hope to change this) > >>> > >>> Dataflow runner jobs are failing for me with 2.3.0 RC1, for > both > >>> Java and Python. > >>> > >>> This is not an issues with the 2.3.0 RC1 SDK, we (google) need > >>> to release worker images. > >>> > >>> I have assigned these bugs to myself, and will be working to > >>> help get these workers released. > >>> > >>> [BEAM-3584] Java dataflow job fails with 2.3.0 RC1, due to > >>> missing worker image > >>> [BEAM-3585] Python dataflow job fails with 2.3.0 RC1, due to > >>> missing worker image > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> > >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks Kenn, > >>> > >>> I prepared the list of tasks I did. I will complete where > >>> release is > >>> out. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On 01/31/2018 03:07 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > >>> > I've cloned the release validation spreadsheet: > >>> > > >>> > https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation > >>> <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation> > >>> <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation > >>> <https://s.apache.org/beam-2.3.0-release-validation>> > >>> > > >>> > If you plan to perform a manual validation task, please > >>> sign up so multiple > >>> > people don't waste effort. > >>> > > >>> > Alan & JB, as far as your pairing up to automate more, > >>> anything manual on this > >>> > sheet should be considered. > >>> > > >>> > Kenn > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> > >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> > >>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> > >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > +1 (binding) > >>> > > >>> > Casting my own +1 ;) > >>> > > >>> > Regards > >>> > JB > >>> > > >>> > On 01/30/2018 09:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>> > > Hi everyone, > >>> > > > >>> > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 > >>> for the version 2.3.0, as > >>> > > follows: > >>> > > > >>> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release > >>> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide > >>> specific comments) > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > The complete staging area is available for your > >>> review, which includes: > >>> > > * JIRA release notes [1], > >>> > > * the official Apache source release to be > deployed > >>> to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> > >>> <http://dist.apache.org> > >>> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2], > >>> > > which is signed with the key with fingerprint > >>> C8282E76 [3], > >>> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven > Central > >>> Repository [4], > >>> > > * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC1" [5], > >>> > > * website pull request listing the release and > >>> publishing the API reference > >>> > > manual [6]. > >>> > > * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and > >>> Oracle JDK 1.8.0_111. > >>> > > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the > >>> source release to the > >>> > > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> > >>> <http://dist.apache.org> > >>> <http://dist.apache.org> [2]. > >>> > > > >>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is > >>> adopted by majority > >>> > approval, > >>> > > with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks, > >>> > > JB > >>> > > > >>> > > [1] > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608 > >>> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608> > >>> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608 > >>> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608>> > >>> > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608 > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608> > >>> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608 > >>> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12319527&version=12341608>>> > >>> > > [2] > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/ > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/> > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/ > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>> > >>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/ > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/> > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/ > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>>> > >>> > > [3] > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS> > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>> > >>> > <https://dist.apache.org/ > repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS> > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > >>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>>> > >>> > > [4] > >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/ > >>> > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1026/> > >>> > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1026/ > >>> > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1026/>> > >>> > > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1026/ > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1026/> > >>> > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1026/ > >>> > >>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebeam-1026/>>> > >>> > > [5] https://github.com/apache/ > beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>> > >>> > <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>>> > >>> > > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>> > >>> > <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381 > >>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>>> > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > >>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>> > >>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > >>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>> > >>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>> jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > >>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>> > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >
