There are two parts of Scio: The DSL API and the interactive REPL. Last I checked (though things may have changed) the REPL was still very Dataflow specific, but the DSL was entirely ported to Beam.
One of the concerns was indeed the release cycle, but I see no reason why Scio could not be released independently (and indeed, as you said, maybe we should even split up our current release). Reuven On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alistair, > > we discussed several times in the past with SCIO guys (especially > Neville), but it seems there's no strong plan right now about a donation > of SCIO in Beam. > I think one of the concern is the release cycle, but I think it makes > sense to think about a release per module in Beam. It would allow use to > release DSLs, IOs/extensions independently. But that's another story ;) > > Regards > JB > > On 21/06/2018 16:34, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any plan to make scio an official scala API for beam? If not, > is there any plan to have a scala API? > > > > Thanks, > > Alistair > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
