Hi. Reuven - sorry to hijack the thread - regarding REPL - what do you mean by it being very Dataflow specific?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > As the code is not hosted at Apache as Beam, I would not consider SCIO > as the "official" Scala DSL. > > However, I agree that it's "de facto" Scala DSL for Beam ;) > > Just "wording" ;) > > Regards > JB > > On 21/06/2018 18:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > I might go so far as to say Scio *is* the official Scala API for Beam. > > We point to it on our website, and have no plans to create another. It > > just happens to not be maintained and released by us. > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Alistair, > >> > >> we discussed several times in the past with SCIO guys (especially > >> Neville), but it seems there's no strong plan right now about a donation > >> of SCIO in Beam. > >> I think one of the concern is the release cycle, but I think it makes > >> sense to think about a release per module in Beam. It would allow use to > >> release DSLs, IOs/extensions independently. But that's another story ;) > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On 21/06/2018 16:34, [email protected] wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Is there any plan to make scio an official scala API for beam? If not, > is there any plan to have a scala API? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Alistair > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> [email protected] > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
