As the code is not hosted at Apache as Beam, I would not consider SCIO as the "official" Scala DSL.
However, I agree that it's "de facto" Scala DSL for Beam ;) Just "wording" ;) Regards JB On 21/06/2018 18:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > I might go so far as to say Scio *is* the official Scala API for Beam. > We point to it on our website, and have no plans to create another. It > just happens to not be maintained and released by us. > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Alistair, >> >> we discussed several times in the past with SCIO guys (especially >> Neville), but it seems there's no strong plan right now about a donation >> of SCIO in Beam. >> I think one of the concern is the release cycle, but I think it makes >> sense to think about a release per module in Beam. It would allow use to >> release DSLs, IOs/extensions independently. But that's another story ;) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 21/06/2018 16:34, [email protected] wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there any plan to make scio an official scala API for beam? If not, is >>> there any plan to have a scala API? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alistair >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
