My understanding was that under the covers it used the low-level Dataflow service API to run the evaluations.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:10 AM Rafal Wojdyla <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > Reuven - sorry to hijack the thread - regarding REPL - what do you mean by > it being very Dataflow specific? > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> As the code is not hosted at Apache as Beam, I would not consider SCIO >> as the "official" Scala DSL. >> >> However, I agree that it's "de facto" Scala DSL for Beam ;) >> >> Just "wording" ;) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 21/06/2018 18:00, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> > I might go so far as to say Scio *is* the official Scala API for Beam. >> > We point to it on our website, and have no plans to create another. It >> > just happens to not be maintained and released by us. >> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Alistair, >> >> >> >> we discussed several times in the past with SCIO guys (especially >> >> Neville), but it seems there's no strong plan right now about a >> donation >> >> of SCIO in Beam. >> >> I think one of the concern is the release cycle, but I think it makes >> >> sense to think about a release per module in Beam. It would allow use >> to >> >> release DSLs, IOs/extensions independently. But that's another story ;) >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> JB >> >> >> >> On 21/06/2018 16:34, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Is there any plan to make scio an official scala API for beam? If >> not, is there any plan to have a scala API? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Alistair >> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > >
