I remember that adding those manually helped a bit. But I could never add
enough jar files to fully got rid of the issue.

And any update to the gradle files and reload in intellij - you are back to
square one.

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:43 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes, you need to manually add the vendor JAR to the modules where it is
> missing. AFAIK there is no automatic solution.
>
> On 04.10.18 16:34, Thomas Weise wrote:
> > Was anyone successful making Intellij understand the dependency
> > vendoring and not display as unresolvable symbols?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:13 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org
> > <mailto:m...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     That's fine, I think we have accepted the fact that IntelliJ only
> works
> >     with delegating the build to Gradle instead of using its built-in
> >     Gradle
> >     support. That comes with a bunch of drawbacks, i.e. slow build/test
> >     execution.
> >
> >      > 4. the current gradle setup still requires some knowledge about
> >     the setup (like for validates runners which are not "just tests")
> >     and there is no trivial way to make the IDE aware of it until you
> >     generate the IDE files (.idea
> >     The ValidatesRunner tests are not part of the IntelliJ setup. These
> are
> >     additional integration test which are part of Gradle but can't be
> >     programmatically called from within IntelliJ.
> >
> >     On 04.10.18 14:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 14:53, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org
> >     <mailto:m...@apache.org>
> >      > <mailto:m...@apache.org <mailto:m...@apache.org>>> a écrit :
> >      >
> >      >      > We have some hints in the gradle files that used to allow a
> >      >     smooth import with no extra steps*. Have the hints gotten out
> of
> >      >     date or are there new hints we can put in that might help?
> >      >
> >      >     If you're referring to the `gradle idea` task which generates
> >     IntelliJ
> >      >     IPR files, that doesn't work anymore. The build is way too
> >     involved for
> >      >     that too work. We've since removed this from the contribute
> >     guide.
> >      >
> >      >     There is still the IntelliJ tips page which describes a
> different
> >      >     (non-working) procedure. In the end, you have to fiddle with
> the
> >      >     project
> >      >     setup, i.e. adding the vendor JAR to the classpath where
> >     necessary. But
> >      >     it breaks as soon as your refresh the Gradle project.
> >      >
> >      >     Romain, can you really get it to work out of the box with
> >     your method?
> >      >     If so, I'd like to contact you for information to update the
> >      >     IntelliJ page.
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > Yep, worked at least last time I tried. I didn't played much with
> >     it but
> >      > I assume it is reproducible. Feel free to ping me on slack.
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >     Note, this is not the first conversation, so we should really
> >     fix the
> >      >     instructions/describe the workarounds. See also
> >      >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c8323622e5de92089ebdfecee09a0e37cae0c631e1bebf06ed9f2bc6@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > The small warn here is that, by design, you will not fix them all
> >     since:
> >      >
> >      > 1. the IDE must run the script to import the project (which is a
> big
> >      > drawback compared to maven where it can be imported without
> >     running any
> >      > project code). This small phase easily breaks if you need
> >     anything from
> >      > the env and beam requires some setup.
> >      > 2. the script defines a lifecycle the IDE can't respect today
> >     cause it
> >      > is coded and not always guessable enough
> >      > 3. running tests in the IDE requires to use the launcher which
> >     rebuilds
> >      > the whole project model before executing anything which is slow
> >     compared
> >      > to IDE default launcher which is way better and the one used my
> >     most dev
> >      > 4. the current gradle setup still requires some knowledge about
> the
> >      > setup (like for validates runners which are not "just tests") and
> >     there
> >      > is no trivial way to make the IDE aware of it until you generate
> >     the IDE
> >      > files (.idea)
> >      >
> >      >     On 01.10.18 23:32, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >      >      > Personally i drop all caches - idea + ivy + maven beam
> folder,
> >      >     build in
> >      >      > console skipping test execution - important cause idea is
> not
> >      >     able to
> >      >      > import the project without a correctly ran gradle setup
> and a
> >      >     failure
> >      >      > can corrupt later imports, then I kill gradle daemon and
> >     finally
> >      >     import
> >      >      > beam in idea using the wrapper.
> >      >      >
> >      >      > As it has been mentionned you will have to run tests using
> >     gradle
> >      >      > wrapper due to current gradle setup which slows down a lot
> the
> >      >     execution
> >      >      > compared to native idea one but at least it will run and
> >     you can
> >      >     debug
> >      >      > normally.
> >      >      >
> >      >      > Le lun. 1 oct. 2018 22:38, Kenneth Knowles
> >     <k...@apache.org <mailto:k...@apache.org>
> >      >     <mailto:k...@apache.org <mailto:k...@apache.org>>
> >      >      > <mailto:k...@apache.org <mailto:k...@apache.org>
> >     <mailto:k...@apache.org <mailto:k...@apache.org>>>> a écrit :
> >      >      >
> >      >      >     We have some hints in the gradle files that used to
> >     allow a
> >      >     smooth
> >      >      >     import with no extra steps*. Have the hints gotten out
> >     of date or
> >      >      >     are there new hints we can put in that might help?
> >      >      >
> >      >      >     Kenn
> >      >      >
> >      >      >     *anyhow at least for a week or two for a couple of
> >     people :-)
> >      >      >
> >      >      >     On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:26 PM Ismaël Mejía
> >      >     <ieme...@gmail.com <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>
> >     <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>>
> >      >      >     <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>
> >     <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
> >      >      >
> >      >      >         Hello Alex,
> >      >      >
> >      >      >         I understand your pain and thanks for bringing this
> >      >     subject, I also
> >      >      >         have found many issues in the process to the point
> of
> >      >     believing
> >      >      >         recently that it is undeterministic.
> >      >      >         Last time I followed the process ~3 weeks ago. I
> >     had to
> >      >     clean up all
> >      >      >         caches (both remove the intelliJ temp files and the
> >      >     gradle cache
> >      >      >         files) and also I had to refresh the project in
> >     IntelliJ's
> >      >      >         gradle tool
> >      >      >         windows view after the initial import at least 2
> times
> >      >     until it
> >      >      >         finally worked. Also remember that 2018.2 is not
> >     supported as
> >      >      >         reported
> >      >      >         by Ryan some weeks ago (not sure if already fixed).
> >      >      >
> >      >      >         Probably there was something corrupted in my setup
> >     but I
> >      >     have heard
> >      >      >         similar stories of at least 2 more people.
> >      >      >         I really don't know how we can improve the current
> >     status quo
> >      >      >         apart of
> >      >      >         contacting the IntelliJ guys but I am concerned on
> how
> >      >     this can
> >      >      >         be an
> >      >      >         issue for new contributors.
> >      >      >
> >      >      >         On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:47 PM Rui Wang
> >      >     <ruw...@google.com <mailto:ruw...@google.com>
> >     <mailto:ruw...@google.com <mailto:ruw...@google.com>>
> >      >      >         <mailto:ruw...@google.com
> >     <mailto:ruw...@google.com> <mailto:ruw...@google.com
> >     <mailto:ruw...@google.com>>>> wrote:
> >      >      >          >
> >      >      >          > Hi Alex,
> >      >      >          >
> >      >      >          > I had troubles when importing JAVA SDK to
> >     intellij at the
> >      >      >         beginning.
> >      >      >          >
> >      >      >          > Besides what the instruction says, some extra
> >     steps that
> >      >      >         might help:
> >      >      >          > 1. Preferences/Settings > Build, Execution,
> >     Deployment >
> >      >      >         Build Tools > Gradle > Runner, choose Gradle Test
> >     Runner
> >      >     in the
> >      >      >         dropdown menu.
> >      >      >          > 2. Enable annotation processor.
> >      >      >          >
> >      >      >          > -Rui
> >      >      >          >
> >      >      >          > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:33 AM Jean-Baptiste
> >     Onofré
> >      >      >         <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>
> >     <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>
> >      >     <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>
> >     <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote:
> >      >      >          >>
> >      >      >          >> Hi Alex,
> >      >      >          >>
> >      >      >          >> After a git clean -fdx (removing all IDEA
> >     resources),
> >      >     I just
> >      >      >         open the
> >      >      >          >> folder in IntelliJ and it imports the project.
> >      >      >          >>
> >      >      >          >> It works fine so far (NB: I don't build using
> >      >     IntelliJ, it's
> >      >      >         mostly an
> >      >      >          >> editor for me, I use the command line for any
> >     other stuff
> >      >      >         like git,
> >      >      >          >> gradle, ...).
> >      >      >          >>
> >      >      >          >> Regards
> >      >      >          >> JB
> >      >      >          >>
> >      >      >          >> On 01/10/2018 20:05, Alex Amato wrote:
> >      >      >          >> > Hello,
> >      >      >          >> >
> >      >      >          >> > I'm looking to get a good intellij setup
> working
> >      >     and then
> >      >      >         update the
> >      >      >          >> > documentation how to build and test the java
> >     SDK with
> >      >      >         intelliJ.
> >      >      >          >> >
> >      >      >          >> > Does anyone have a good setup working, with
> some
> >      >     tips? I
> >      >      >         followed our
> >      >      >          >> > instructions here, but I found that after
> >     following
> >      >     these
> >      >      >         steps I could
> >      >      >          >> > not build or test the project. It seemed
> >     like the build
> >      >      >         button did
> >      >      >          >> > nothing and the test buttons did not appear.
> >      >      >          >> > https://beam.apache.org/contribute/intellij/
> >      >      >          >> >
> >      >      >          >> > I'm also curious about the gradle support for
> >      >     generating
> >      >      >         intelliJ
> >      >      >          >> > projects. Has anyone tried this as well?
> >      >      >          >> >
> >      >      >          >> > Any tips would be appreciated.
> >      >      >          >> > Thank you,
> >      >      >          >> > Alex
> >      >      >          >>
> >      >      >          >> --
> >      >      >          >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >      >      >          >> jbono...@apache.org
> >     <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org
> >     <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>
> >      >     <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
> >     <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>>
> >      >      >          >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >      >      >          >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >      >      >
> >      >
> >
>

Reply via email to