I've filed the IP Clearance. I'll report back here.

Kenn

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:33 PM David Morávek <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> Anton:
> All of the points are be correct, with one minor exception. We are
> currently moving our production workloads from Euphoria
> <https://github.com/seznam/euphoria> to Beam (using the DSL), but we are
> hitting scalability issues of the current spark runner, so it is not
> technically used in production yet. Everything behaves correctly in the
> staging environment, where runner can handle the workload.
>
> Kenn:
> here is the the IP Clearance document
> https://gist.github.com/dmvk/80acb0579f196e18c02a4e280978d445
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:30 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I just glanced through it to make sure things are in the right place and
>> build set up right and that all LGTM.
>>
>> We need to file the IP Clearance to finish the process that Davor
>> started. Please fill the XML template at
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.xml
>> then I will review and file it in SVN.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:15 PM Anton Kedin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the code looks good and we should probably just merge it (unless
>>> there are other blockers, e.g. formal approvals), considering:
>>>  - it has been reviewed;
>>>  - it is tested and used in production;
>>>  - it was discussed on the list and there were no objections to having
>>> it as part of Beam;
>>>  - it is a standalone extension and doesn't interfere with Beam Java
>>> SDK, if I didn't miss anything;
>>>  - it has people working on it and supporting it;
>>>
>>> All other issues can probably be sorted out in normal Beam process.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Anton
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:57 AM David Morávek <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Max,
>>>>
>>>> It would be great if you can do more of a "general" review, the code
>>>> base is fairly large, well tested and it was already reviewed internally by
>>>> several people.
>>>>
>>>> We would like to have the overall approach and design decisions
>>>> validated by the community and get some inputs on what could be improved
>>>> and if we are headed the right direction.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:21 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That is a huge PR! :) Euphoria looks great. Especially for people
>>>>> coming
>>>>> from Flink/Spark. I'll check out the documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any specific code parts which you want to have reviewed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Max
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10.10.18 10:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks for all the work you are doing on this DSL !
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I tried to follow the features branch for a while. I'm still
>>>>> committed
>>>>> > to  move forward on that front,  but more reviewers would be great.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> > JB
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 10/10/2018 10:26, Plajt, Vaclav wrote:
>>>>> >> Hello Beam devs,
>>>>> >> we finished our main goals in development of Euphoria DSL. It is
>>>>> Easy to
>>>>> >> use Java 8 API build on top of the Beam's Java SDK. API provides a
>>>>> >> high-level abstraction of data transformations, with focus on the
>>>>> Java 8
>>>>> >> language features (e.g. lambdas and streams). It is fully
>>>>> inter-operable
>>>>> >> with existing Beam SDK and convertible back and forth. It allows
>>>>> fast
>>>>> >> prototyping through use of (optional) Kryo based coders and can be
>>>>> >> seamlessly integrated into existing Beam Pipelines.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Now we believe that it is the time to start discussion about it
>>>>> with the
>>>>> >> community. Which will hopefully lead to vote about adapting it into
>>>>> >> Apache Beam project. Most of main ideas and development goals were
>>>>> >> presented in Beam Summit in London [1].
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> We are looking for reviewers within the community. Please start with
>>>>> >> documentation [2] or design document [3]. Our contribution is
>>>>> divided to
>>>>> >> two modules: `org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-euphoria`
>>>>> and
>>>>> >> `org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-extensions-kryo`. Rest of the code
>>>>> base
>>>>> >> remains untouched.
>>>>> >> All the checks in MR [5] are passing with exception of "Website
>>>>> >> PreCommit". Which seems to be broken, little help here would be
>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thank you
>>>>> >> We are looking forward for your feedback.
>>>>> >> {david.moravek,vaclav.plajt,marek.simunek}@firma.seznam.cz
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Resources:
>>>>> >> [1] Beam Summit London presentation:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SagpmzJ-tUQki5VsQOEEEUyi_LXRJdG_3OBLdjBKoh4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>> >> [2] Documentation:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> https://github.com/seznam/beam/blob/dsl-euphoria/website/src/documentation/sdks/euphoria.md
>>>>> >> [3] Design Document: https://s.apache.org/beam-euphoria
>>>>> >> [4] ASF Jira Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3900
>>>>> >> [5] Pull Request: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6601
>>>>> >> [6] Original proposal:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/beam-dev/201712.mbox/%3ccajjqkhnrp1z8atteogmpfkqxrcjeanb3ykowvvtnwyrvv_-...@mail.gmail.com%3e
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Je dobré vědět, že tento e-mail a přílohy jsou důvěrné. Pokud spolu
>>>>> >> jednáme o uzavření obchodu, vyhrazujeme si právo naše jednání
>>>>> kdykoli
>>>>> >> ukončit. Pro fanoušky právní mluvy - vylučujeme tím ustanovení
>>>>> >> občanského zákoníku o předsmluvní odpovědnosti. Pravidla o tom, kdo
>>>>> u
>>>>> >> nás a jak vystupuje za společnost a kdo může co a jak podepsat
>>>>> naleznete
>>>>> >> zde <https://onas.seznam.cz/cz/podpisovy-rad-cz.html>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> You should know that this e-mail and its attachments are
>>>>> confidential.
>>>>> >> If we are negotiating on the conclusion of a transaction, we
>>>>> reserve the
>>>>> >> right to terminate the negotiations at any time. For fans of
>>>>> legalese—we
>>>>> >> hereby exclude the provisions of the Civil Code on pre-contractual
>>>>> >> liability. The rules about who and how may act for the company and
>>>>> what
>>>>> >> are the signing procedures can be found here
>>>>> >> <https://onas.seznam.cz/cz/signature-rules.html>.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to