I think this is a good idea.

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:50 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sounds like a good plan to me, but I haven't been the one monitoring this
> spreadsheet (or twitter for that matter). Spam is a concern, but
> everything is moderated so I think we try it out and see if the volume is
> really high enough to be an issue.
>

I agree with Robert. Google forms supports form validation. We can
eliminate most botspam with that. Rest of it can be handled with moderation.


>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:46 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I like having easier notifications. It would be great if the
>> notifications had the content also. I get notifications on the spreadsheet,
>> but since I have to click through to look at them there is a little bit of
>> friction.
>>
>> 1. Is it still easy to add the other columns to record LGTM and when they
>> have been sent?
>> 2. Risk of spam?
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:56 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I wanted to propose some improvements to the existing process of
>>> proposing tweets for the Apache Beam Twitter account.
>>>
>>> Currently the process requires people to request edit access, and then
>>> add tweets on the spreadsheet [1]. I use it a lot because I know the
>>> process well, but I think this may limit newcomers from proposing changes,
>>> and can make things difficult for them.
>>> I am proposing to use a Google Form (see example[2]), which will
>>> populare the same spreadsheet. The advantages of this is that it will be
>>> open for everyone, and it will be easier to subscribe to notifications
>>> every time someone adds a new tweet proposal.
>>>
>>> The review process by the PMC would remain in place as-is.
>>>
>>> What does everyone think?
>>> Thanks
>>> Aizhamal
>>>
>>> [1] https://s.apache.org/beam-tweets
>>> [2]
>>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSepI3zVZNmA9RUAzAnhH45IZU48uCt0qmPPYyZOEZCFONQZ6w/viewform
>>>
>>

Reply via email to