Hi Bruce, thanks for the update regarding OOo.
On 14-Spe-2005 at 13:25 -0400 Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > one issue that we're going to have to return to is the format: > whether it's MODS, or something else. I've grown a little > uncomfortable with standardizing on MODS. I would find it rather, uuhm, frustrating to see you (and the OOo folks) move away from MODS. Especially since it was *you* who convinced us to support it within our bibliographic applications. ;-) Admittedly, I don't really understand (literally) many things you're arguing about why RDF would be a better solution. This is way over my head. However, could there be a solution where both formats go hand in hand together and where OOo would simply accept both formats -- no matter how it stores it's stuff internally? Thanks, Matthias --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
