Quoting Matthew Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I was really hopeful a year or so ago that better > bibliographic support would be built in by now.
As was I, and I should say that one of the reasons the current situation really bums me out is that there are a number of python-based teaching projects I *could* potentially manage on my own which I think would be really cool -- e.g., integrating OOo with a web-based bibliography & course wiki, thus allowing for persistent content over multiple iterations of a course (so for instance my course Science Technology and Modernity, which I have a high opinion of, could be transformed into a significant web resource for a larger community by virtue of the collective efforts of students). I guess I could try them without OOo -- try something like Peter Sefton's very cool courseware -- but without it it'll be much harder to get the teaching payoff I feel my students need. So I certainly am disappointed. Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
