Hi Evans,

thanks for picking up the discussion. I have a rather strong opinion towards reverting back to RTC, too.

I am miss the discussion a lot.

Thanks
   Olaf



Am 15.01.2017 um 09:40 schrieb Evans Ye:
Hi Bigtopers,

A year has pasted since we adopted CTR(Commit then Review) model.
I can see some draw back in this journey, hence I'd like to propose we
revert the working model back to RTC(Review Then Commit).

Let me list down some known problems I can think of.
Before I do so, you should know following are not pointing to someone
particularly. And these may be bias opinions since I'm silencing for a long
while in the community.

a). The community has less conversation because there's no +1 required.
b). Sometimes Committers are working alone, left the contributors out side
of the game.
c). Communication is the core of the open source community. Without this
it's not fun anymore contributing.

When we adopted CTR, we thought that there will be more time for Committers
to review and interact with contributors, but turns out there's no time.
Maybe we just simply need the guilty back to drive us  forward.

Any different voice here?


2015-11-25 4:03 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>:

With ten +1's; one 0's; and none -1's the [VOTE] has passed. Thanks
everyone
for casting yours.

I will go ahead and update the top-level README file to reflect on this.

Cheers,
  Cos

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:34AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Using CTR for the Bigtop project has been discussed, experimented for a
few
months, and discussed again on this long thread [1] for alomost a year
now. The
consensus seems to be reached, but because this is a policy change I'd
like to
bring it up for the vote.

So, please cast your for per the following ledger

[ ] +1, make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project
[ ] +0, I don't care either way,
[ ] -1, do not make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project
because...

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
Tuesday, Nov
24 at noon PST.

[1] http://is.gd/TgBovX

Thanks,
  Cos








Reply via email to