I agree with Evans. I'll admit that I have been busy with other things (i.e. a new job), hence part of my silence in the BigTop community. However, I also agree that the required conversation around new commits made it easier to engage with others.
The reduced amount of conversation can also hurt new contributors. I believe it is worth discussing returning to the RTC model. On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Evans, > > thanks for picking up the discussion. I have a rather strong opinion > towards reverting back to RTC, too. > > I am miss the discussion a lot. > > Thanks > Olaf > > > > > Am 15.01.2017 um 09:40 schrieb Evans Ye: > >> Hi Bigtopers, >> >> A year has pasted since we adopted CTR(Commit then Review) model. >> I can see some draw back in this journey, hence I'd like to propose we >> revert the working model back to RTC(Review Then Commit). >> >> Let me list down some known problems I can think of. >> Before I do so, you should know following are not pointing to someone >> particularly. And these may be bias opinions since I'm silencing for a >> long >> while in the community. >> >> a). The community has less conversation because there's no +1 required. >> b). Sometimes Committers are working alone, left the contributors out side >> of the game. >> c). Communication is the core of the open source community. Without this >> it's not fun anymore contributing. >> >> When we adopted CTR, we thought that there will be more time for >> Committers >> to review and interact with contributors, but turns out there's no time. >> Maybe we just simply need the guilty back to drive us forward. >> >> Any different voice here? >> >> >> 2015-11-25 4:03 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: >> >> With ten +1's; one 0's; and none -1's the [VOTE] has passed. Thanks >>> everyone >>> for casting yours. >>> >>> I will go ahead and update the top-level README file to reflect on this. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Cos >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:34AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>> >>>> Using CTR for the Bigtop project has been discussed, experimented for a >>>> >>> few >>> >>>> months, and discussed again on this long thread [1] for alomost a year >>>> >>> now. The >>> >>>> consensus seems to be reached, but because this is a policy change I'd >>>> >>> like to >>> >>>> bring it up for the vote. >>>> >>>> So, please cast your for per the following ledger >>>> >>>> [ ] +1, make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project >>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way, >>>> [ ] -1, do not make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project >>>> >>> because... >>> >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be closed on >>>> >>> Tuesday, Nov >>> >>>> 24 at noon PST. >>>> >>>> [1] http://is.gd/TgBovX >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Cos >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>
