I don't think there's a workable halfway here. On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jay Vyas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not CTR into a branch > > And RTC in jira that promotes the branch to master? > > That way process can continue and those interested can delay promotion to > master , without delaying other progress > > > On Jan 17, 2017, at 12:08 PM, RJ Nowling <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I agree with Evans. > > > > I'll admit that I have been busy with other things (i.e. a new job), > hence > > part of my silence in the BigTop community. However, I also agree that > the > > required conversation around new commits made it easier to engage with > > others. > > > > The reduced amount of conversation can also hurt new contributors. > > > > I believe it is worth discussing returning to the RTC model. > > > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Evans, > >> > >> thanks for picking up the discussion. I have a rather strong opinion > >> towards reverting back to RTC, too. > >> > >> I am miss the discussion a lot. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Olaf > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Am 15.01.2017 um 09:40 schrieb Evans Ye: > >>> > >>> Hi Bigtopers, > >>> > >>> A year has pasted since we adopted CTR(Commit then Review) model. > >>> I can see some draw back in this journey, hence I'd like to propose we > >>> revert the working model back to RTC(Review Then Commit). > >>> > >>> Let me list down some known problems I can think of. > >>> Before I do so, you should know following are not pointing to someone > >>> particularly. And these may be bias opinions since I'm silencing for a > >>> long > >>> while in the community. > >>> > >>> a). The community has less conversation because there's no +1 required. > >>> b). Sometimes Committers are working alone, left the contributors out > side > >>> of the game. > >>> c). Communication is the core of the open source community. Without > this > >>> it's not fun anymore contributing. > >>> > >>> When we adopted CTR, we thought that there will be more time for > >>> Committers > >>> to review and interact with contributors, but turns out there's no > time. > >>> Maybe we just simply need the guilty back to drive us forward. > >>> > >>> Any different voice here? > >>> > >>> > >>> 2015-11-25 4:03 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> With ten +1's; one 0's; and none -1's the [VOTE] has passed. Thanks > >>>> everyone > >>>> for casting yours. > >>>> > >>>> I will go ahead and update the top-level README file to reflect on > this. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Cos > >>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:34AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Using CTR for the Bigtop project has been discussed, experimented > for a > >>>>> > >>>> few > >>>> > >>>>> months, and discussed again on this long thread [1] for alomost a > year > >>>>> > >>>> now. The > >>>> > >>>>> consensus seems to be reached, but because this is a policy change > I'd > >>>>> > >>>> like to > >>>> > >>>>> bring it up for the vote. > >>>>> > >>>>> So, please cast your for per the following ledger > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1, make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project > >>>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way, > >>>>> [ ] -1, do not make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project > >>>>> > >>>> because... > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be closed on > >>>>> > >>>> Tuesday, Nov > >>>> > >>>>> 24 at noon PST. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] http://is.gd/TgBovX > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Cos > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > -- Best regards, - Andy If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond Teller (via Peter Watts)
